Title 138 · ORS Chapter 138
135.335; or ����� (b) Identify a colorable claim of error reviewable under ORS 138.105. ����� (2) If a defendant appeals from any of the following judgments or orders, the notice of appeal must iden
Citation: ORS 135.335
Section: 135.335
135.335; or
����� (b) Identify a colorable claim of error reviewable under ORS 138.105.
����� (2) If a defendant appeals from any of the following judgments or orders, the notice of appeal must identify a colorable claim of error reviewable under ORS 138.105.
����� (a) A trial court�s judgment or order:
����� (A) Revoking probation;
����� (B) Extending the period of probation;
����� (C) Imposing a new condition of probation;
����� (D) Modifying an existing condition of probation; or
����� (E) Revoking a sentence suspension; or
����� (b) A judgment resentencing the defendant pursuant to a decision by an appellate court or a circuit court granting post-conviction relief.
����� (3) The requirements of subsections (1) and (2) of this section are not jurisdictional, but the appellate court may dismiss the appeal if the notice of appeal fails to contain the required statement or fails to identify the colorable claim of error and the defendant fails to correct the deficiency after having been given the opportunity to do so. [2017 c.529 �6]
����� 138.090 Signature to notice of appeal. The notice of appeal shall be signed by:
����� (1) The district attorney for the county or by the Attorney General, when an appeal is taken on behalf of the State of Oregon in a prosecution of an offense created by state statute.
����� (2) The defendant or an attorney for the defendant, when the defendant takes an appeal.
����� (3) County counsel for the county, when the county appeals in a prosecution for violating a county ordinance.
����� (4) City counsel for the city, when the city appeals in a prosecution for violating an offense created by the city�s charter or by ordinance. [Amended by 1975 c.119 �1; 2025 c.268 �32a]
����� 138.100 [Amended by 1959 c.558 �38; 1961 c.101 �1; repealed by 1971 c.565 �1]
(Matters Reviewable on Appeal)
����� 138.105 Appeal by defendant. (1) On appeal by a defendant, the appellate court has authority to review the judgment or order being appealed, subject to the provisions of this section.
����� (2) The appellate court has authority to review only questions of law appearing on the record.
����� (3) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the appellate court has authority to review any intermediate decision of the trial court.
����� (4) On appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence, the appellate court has authority to review:
����� (a) The denial of a motion for new trial based on juror misconduct or newly discovered evidence; and
����� (b) The denial of a motion in arrest of judgment.
����� (5) The appellate court has no authority to review the validity of the defendant�s plea of guilty or no contest, or a conviction based on the defendant�s plea of guilty or no contest, except that:
����� (a) The appellate court has authority to review the trial court�s adverse determination of a pretrial motion reserved in a conditional plea of guilty or no contest under ORS 135.335.
����� (b) The appellate court has authority to review whether the trial court erred by not merging determinations of guilt of two or more offenses, unless the entry of separate convictions results from an agreement between the state and the defendant.
����� (6) On appeal from a judgment ordering payment of restitution but not specifying the amount of restitution, the appellate court has no authority to review the decision to award restitution.
����� (7) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (8) and (9) of this section, the appellate court has authority to review any sentence to determine whether the trial court failed to comply with requirements of law in imposing or failing to impose a sentence.
����� (8) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (9) of this section, for a sentence imposed on conviction of a felony committed on or after November 1, 1989:
����� (a) The appellate court has no authority to review:
����� (A) A sentence that is within the presumptive sentence prescribed by the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission.
����� (B) A sentence of probation when the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission prescribe a presumptive sentence of imprisonment but allow a sentence of probation without departure.
����� (C) A sentence of imprisonment when the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission prescribe a presumptive sentence of imprisonment but allow a sentence of probation without departure.
����� (b) If the trial court imposed a sentence that departs from the presumptive sentence prescribed by the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission, the appellate court�s authority to review is limited to whether the trial court�s findings of fact and reasons justifying a departure from the sentence prescribed by the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission:
����� (A) Are supported by the evidence in the record; and
����� (B) Constitute substantial and compelling reasons for departure.
����� (c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this subsection, the appellate court has authority to review whether the sentencing court erred:
����� (A) In ranking the crime seriousness classification of the current crime or in determining the appropriate classification of a prior conviction or juvenile adjudication for criminal history purposes.
����� (B) In imposing or failing to impose a minimum sentence prescribed by ORS 137.700 or 137.707.
����� (9) The appellate court has no authority to review any part of a sentence resulting from a stipulated sentencing agreement between the state and the defendant.
����� (10)(a) On appeal from a corrected or amended judgment that is entered before expiration of the applicable period under ORS 138.071 (1) or (2) during which the original judgment can be appealed, the appellate court has authority to review the judgment, including the corrections or amendments, as provided in this section.
����� (b) On appeal from a corrected or amended judgment that is entered after expiration of the applicable period under ORS 138.071 (1) or (2) during which the original judgment was or could have been appealed, the appellate court has authority to review, as provided in this section, only the corrected or amended part of the judgment, any part of the judgment affected by the correction or amendment, or the trial court�s decision under ORS 137.172 not to correct or amend the judgment.
����� (c) As used in this subsection, �judgment� means any appealable judgment or order.
����� (11)(a) On a defendant�s cross-appeal under ORS 138.035 (5), the appellate court may, in its discretion, limit review to any decision by the trial court that is inextricably linked, either factually or legally, to the state�s appeal.
����� (b) The failure to file a cross-appeal under ORS 138.035 (5) does not waive a defendant�s right to assign error to a particular ruling of the trial court on appeal from a judgment. [2017 c.529 �13]
����� 138.110 [Amended by 1963 c.324 �1; 1971 c.565 �24; repealed by 2017 c.529 �26]
����� 138.115 Appeal by state. (1) On appeal by the state, the appellate court has authority to review the judgment or order being appealed, subject to the provisions of this section.
����� (2) The appellate court has authority to review only questions of law appearing on the record.
����� (3) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the appellate court has authority to review any intermediate decision involving the merits of, or necessarily affecting, the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken.
����� (4)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, on appeal from a judgment of conviction of any felony, the appellate court has authority to review only the sentence as provided by subsections (5) and (6) of this section.
����� (b) The appellate court has authority to review whether the trial court erred in merging determinations of guilt of two or more offenses, unless the merger of determinations of guilt resulted from an agreement between the state and the defendant.
����� (5) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (6) and (7) of this section, the appellate court has authority to review the sentence imposed on conviction of any felony to determine whether the trial court failed to comply with requirements of law in imposing or failing to impose a sentence.
����� (6) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (7) of this section, for a sentence imposed on conviction of a felony committed on or after November 1, 1989:
����� (a) The appellate court has no authority to review:
����� (A) A sentence that is within the presumptive sentence prescribed by the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission.
����� (B) A sentence of probation when the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission prescribe a presumptive sentence of imprisonment but allow a sentence of probation without departure.
����� (C) A sentence of imprisonment when the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission prescribe a presumptive sentence of imprisonment but allow a sentence of probation without departure.
����� (b) If the trial court imposed a sentence that departs from the presumptive sentence prescribed by the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission, the appellate court�s authority to review is limited to whether the trial court�s findings of fact and reasons justifying a departure from the sentence prescribed by the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission:
����� (A) Are supported by the evidence in the record; and
����� (B) Constitute substantial and compelling reasons for departure.
����� (c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this subsection, the appellate court has authority to review whether the sentencing court erred:
����� (A) In ranking the crime seriousness classification of the current crime or in determining the appropriate classification of a prior conviction or juvenile adjudication for criminal history purposes.
����� (B) In imposing or failing to impose a minimum sentence prescribed by ORS 137.700 or 137.707.
����� (7) The appellate court has no authority to review any part of a sentence resulting from a stipulated sentencing agreement between the state and the defendant.
����� (8)(a) On appeal from a corrected or amended judgment that is entered before expiration of the applicable period under ORS 138.071 (1) or (2) during which the original judgment can be appealed, the appellate court has authority to review the judgment, including the corrections or amendments, as provided in this section.
����� (b) On appeal from a corrected or amended judgment that is entered after expiration of the applicable period under ORS 138.071 (1) or (2) during which the original judgment was or could have been appealed, the appellate court has authority to review, as provided in this section, only the corrected or amended part of the judgment, any part of the judgment affected by the correction or amendment, or the trial court�s decision under ORS 137.172 not to correct or amend the judgment.
����� (c) As used in this subsection, �judgment� means any appealable judgment or order. [2017 c.529 �14]
����� 138.120 [Repealed by 2017 c.529 �26]
����� 138.125 [2013 c.151 �1; renumbered 138.285 in 2017]
����� 138.130 [Repealed by 1963 c.155 �1 (138.135 and 138.145 enacted in lieu of 138.130, 138.140 and 138.150)]
����� 138.135 [1963 c.155 �2 (138.135 and